It used to cost a lot of money to record and promote new music. Artists struggled like hell to find a patron to support them (i.e. a label). Everything was controlled and only a few artists became stars. That was the major label system. Most artists learned quickly when the recording advance money ran out that they needed other sources of income like performing, songwriting and the sales of merchandise to survive. The new artist model says anybody can make and distribute a recording. It is much less expensive to make a record today and recorded music is only going to become less valuable to everyone over time. The real hard part is promotion. The true nemesis of the artist is obscurity. There is a glut of music out there and the situation is only going to get worse. This is the reality of the future of music, abundance and saturation.

Record companies alone cannot afford to invest in the future of artists. They are like the Detroit auto makers of the mid 1980’s. The business model that drove the music industry for the last 70 years is almost dead. Unfortunately, the economics of today’s popular digital music splits (iTunes) do not make any sense for artists. Why make $0.06 off an iTunes download, when you can make $0.80 doing it yourself? If you don’t own your masters then you have nothing.

Personal connection with a fan base is the hallmark of the masterful entertainer. Truly great artists engage their audience while playing shows by working the room. Today artists can establish meaningful virtual relationships directly with their audience by building an online fan base and answering online posts and comments and taking the time to interact with their fans. The reach of a live show can be magnified with the orbit and power of a networked online community.  To be sure, it is a lot of work to monitor the boards and keep up with the postings, but it is a lot easier than touring 250 nights a year, and the payoff can be massive.

This is just like employing street teams to build buzz and selling CDs out of the back of the tour van, both of which are proven tactics to build audience and create direct relationships between artists and fans. Only now the street teams are virtual and the van is open for business in every city across the globe all the time. The name of the game for bands is to know who your audience is and what they like and where they are coming from. You cater to that and you might just have a chance at a career in the new music economy.

Artists, songwriters and producers of the future need to find ways to break through the noise and stand out without significant recording revenue. That model is no longer going to work. Artists of the future are going to need musician businesses built around them that attract audience without relying on recordings to finance the machine. We have already seen how this is possible today, and it is going to become more commonplace over time.

The recording has lost much of its perceived value and musicians are going to have to struggle with that new reality. Sales of records and CDs will never again be the cash cow the major labels got fat and happy on. But recorded music can play a major part in the promotional strategy of new musician businesses and even make some money.

The future of music distribution is going to be mobile and oriented toward mobile devices. Think Nokia. The culture of payment that exists in the mobile space will support transactional and subscription models for music that will capture people’s attention. It is going to become more about having access to music than actually owning it.

Sales of CDs are falling off a cliff as people find it easier and easier to get music digitally. The value of recorded music is plummeting and not even Apple can make money off of it. About iTunes, Steve Jobs says “Most of the money goes to the music companies, we would like to break even/make a little bit of money but it’s not a money maker.” It has just kept Apple out of court with the labels.

The packaging and sales of recorded music is being ripped apart with full albums and CDs being cannibalized by the new digital single track downloads. New bands are going to have to try new formats for recorded music to extract any real recording related profits in the future.

The broadband Internet, 3G mobile phones and MP3 players have fundamentally shifted the balance of power in the music industry forever, especially for the young. Owning CDs is so last century.

The big money for artists has always come from live performance, sales of merchandise, DVDs, personal appearances, publishing and alternative revenue streams – all promoted and supported by the free and nearly free distribution of recorded music. Live performances and t-shirts cannot be digitized at least at the moment, and the experience of being at a live event is going to have to get more appealing, for many bands to survive in the coming years.

New Artist Model

In reality, this is the way is has been for most artists for the past 50 years. Only now the tide has turned, and the shifting sands of the music business will form around an entirely new promotional model that puts we, the music fans, at the very center of the circle. It’s going to be entertaining to be sure.

    I’m not sure I agree that recorded music is going to lose its value. If anything, it should gain in value with the music like water model. If no one cares about ownership and begins streaming music via wireless networks then it will finally be possible to pay artists per PLAY instead of download since ownership will be a mute point. I see a HUGE business for artists in this arena. People will flock to the service as it will seem free (the fee will probably be bundled with your broadband internet payment), yet provide reliability that the P2P’s cannot. Let’s say you get 100 million people to pay $5/month to their ISP for wireless access to every recording ever created. That’s $500 million/month to divy up to all the artists. Not bad, and that’s just the beginning. There are close to a billion internet users. Let’s say you get half of them to pay…that’s roughly $2.5 billion/month to be divied out to artists (minus operating fees, etc.). So how again is recorded music going to lose its value?

    Music and Creativity in a Digital Age

    I wrote this in 1998. Check out this post over at Future of Music that inspired me to repost my almost ten-year-old rant. rant`, N; a vain and promiscuous expression of personal conjecture. I hold a few presumptions going…

    Under “alternative revenue”, I’d suggest ad agencies..

    http://www.jeremiahjacobs.com/blog/archives/000211.html

    Music and Creativity in a Digital Age

    I wrote this in 2001. Check out this post over at Future of Music that inspired me to repost my rant. rant`, N; a vain and promiscuous expression of personal conjecture. I hold a few presumptions going into this…

    I have to dissagree with some of what you are saying here. Yes there is going to be change and toward a phase out of the CD. But I think there will still be a value for recorded music.

    Yes i do agree a little because more people are going for the internet based selling, like many go to myspace to advertise. But there will always be a market for cd recording.

    […] Marie Horn wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIt used to cost a lot of money to record and promote new music. Artists struggled like hell to find a patron to support them (ie a label). Everything was controlled and only a few artists became stars. That was the major label system. … […]

    […] Henry Chesbrough wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe new artist model says anybody can make and distribute a recording. It is much less expensive to make a record today and recorded music is only going to become less valuable to everyone over time. The real hard part is promotion. … […]

    […] full story here […]

    […] Read the rest of this great post here […]

    […] here to […]

    […] all the details here […]

    […] here for more This entry was posted on Sunday, October 21st, 2007 at 11:59 am and is filed under music […]

    I think the new artist model is already here, to take the place of the majors, and get fans and bands in business together: www.sellaband.com .
    There, the fans are the record company.

    I think the point is that the perceived value of owning recording music is nearing zero in that there are too many ways to get recorded music for free and young people in particular are of the mind-set that “information (including music) should be free.” They will buy merchandise such as t-shirts, attend shows, etc. and expect to pay for that, but the music itself for the most part isn’t something the new generation really considers necessary to purchase. However, a really good service, if it’s very reasonably priced, might work, but my experience with young people is that they all have iPods and don’t listen to regular or Internet radio so it’s how things get on the digital music devices that determines whether music is paid for at all. Verizon charges $15/month for their vcast service which didn’t impress me at all, and then $2 to directly download a song to a phone. That’s way too much money to discourage copying to the device without paying.

    All these ‘New Music Models’ miss the point: even in the new digital economy, artists need money to tell the world that they exist, this is not going to come from record labels in the future; some will come directly from the customers as in Slice The Pie Et Al but generally we still have nothing better to replace the old model of manufactured scarcity, other than working together to get the best artists heard, All The Best, DeanoUK, WWW.TOURDATES.CO.UK

    […] Kusek states in his blog for his new book called “The Future of Music” that since live performances and […]

    There is a small issue that many people tend to overlook.

    Often new artists need to publish a physical CD still. Music critics, journalists, DJ’s and reviewers will not review music which are not published on a physical media. They even often still request CD’s send to them, and refuse downloads.

    Secondly, registering your copyrights is also still to a large extend linked to the physical medium.

    This is real stupid, as it adds considerably to the cost of publishing a new set of songs or tunes.

    Today this procedure is a complete waste, and the sooner it is stopped the better.

Leave a Comment